<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 1940s Happened in Greyscale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/the-1940s-happened-in-greyscale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/the-1940s-happened-in-greyscale/</link>
	<description>Where Bad Maps Come From</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bricknell</title>
		<link>http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/the-1940s-happened-in-greyscale/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Bricknell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to thank Mr. Huffman for this opportunity to share my map. This feedback is most appreciated.  This exercise was an exciting project and was influenced by the August 24, 2009 Episode No.9 from The History Detectives. The lack of any (good) map from this episode made me want to search for this data. I went to the University of Wisconsin-Madison Memorial Library and found the Smithsonian Annals of Flight No. 9, 1973 article. This article included maps and data researched by historian Mr. Robert C. Mikesh. I could not find a recent map on this topic.  I feel this was my re-interpretation of the data based on existing sources and I hope to revisit this project in the future to improve based on these suggestions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to thank Mr. Huffman for this opportunity to share my map. This feedback is most appreciated.  This exercise was an exciting project and was influenced by the August 24, 2009 Episode No.9 from The History Detectives. The lack of any (good) map from this episode made me want to search for this data. I went to the University of Wisconsin-Madison Memorial Library and found the Smithsonian Annals of Flight No. 9, 1973 article. This article included maps and data researched by historian Mr. Robert C. Mikesh. I could not find a recent map on this topic.  I feel this was my re-interpretation of the data based on existing sources and I hope to revisit this project in the future to improve based on these suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/the-1940s-happened-in-greyscale/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The changing shades of red/pink for timeline doesn&#039;t work for me.  Before I saw that part of the legend, I thought it would represent some sort of damage evaluation - dud, exploded-no damage, exploded-property damage, exploded-injuries/deaths, or something like that.

I&#039;d also want to see some internal detail in the states - big cities, major military installations, or the like.  There&#039;s a cluster I recognize as being in and around Sonoma County, but how close to Sacramento is the cluster to the northeast? How close to LA is that cluster in Southern California? How close to Boise is that one in the middle of Idaho?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The changing shades of red/pink for timeline doesn&#8217;t work for me.  Before I saw that part of the legend, I thought it would represent some sort of damage evaluation &#8211; dud, exploded-no damage, exploded-property damage, exploded-injuries/deaths, or something like that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also want to see some internal detail in the states &#8211; big cities, major military installations, or the like.  There&#8217;s a cluster I recognize as being in and around Sonoma County, but how close to Sacramento is the cluster to the northeast? How close to LA is that cluster in Southern California? How close to Boise is that one in the middle of Idaho?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Swanson</title>
		<link>http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/the-1940s-happened-in-greyscale/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik Swanson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very nice map, on a subject I have found quite interesting since I first learned about it a decade or more ago.  I just have a few proofreading-type text edits to suggest.  The 5 kg bomb I would term &quot;anti-personnel&quot; rather than &quot;anti-personal&quot;, and the references I have seen report it as a one 15 kg bomb (rather than one 5 kg bomb).  And if I may be so bold as to offer the following corrected text block:

The Japanese military launched nearly
9,300 balloon bombs to attack the United
States during World War II. Launched from
three primary sites on the east coast of
Japan the balloons followed the strong
wind currents to reach North America.
Documented military accounts from
November 1944 to July 1945 counted 285
positive sightings either on the ground or
in the air. The technology placed inside
these weapons allowed them to regulate
their altitude between 30,000-40,000 ft
and release their weapons after a period
of time. The only casualties on mainland
United States during World War II were
caused when an Oregon church group
investigated a downed balloon while on
a picnic, setting off the device.

Those are my suggestions; others will undoubtedly have different opinions about comma placement.  But I do note that it was a church group, rather than a family.  Killed were the pastor&#039;s wife, and five children.  Two of the children were related, but none were related to the pastor&#039;s wife.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice map, on a subject I have found quite interesting since I first learned about it a decade or more ago.  I just have a few proofreading-type text edits to suggest.  The 5 kg bomb I would term &#8220;anti-personnel&#8221; rather than &#8220;anti-personal&#8221;, and the references I have seen report it as a one 15 kg bomb (rather than one 5 kg bomb).  And if I may be so bold as to offer the following corrected text block:</p>
<p>The Japanese military launched nearly<br />
9,300 balloon bombs to attack the United<br />
States during World War II. Launched from<br />
three primary sites on the east coast of<br />
Japan the balloons followed the strong<br />
wind currents to reach North America.<br />
Documented military accounts from<br />
November 1944 to July 1945 counted 285<br />
positive sightings either on the ground or<br />
in the air. The technology placed inside<br />
these weapons allowed them to regulate<br />
their altitude between 30,000-40,000 ft<br />
and release their weapons after a period<br />
of time. The only casualties on mainland<br />
United States during World War II were<br />
caused when an Oregon church group<br />
investigated a downed balloon while on<br />
a picnic, setting off the device.</p>
<p>Those are my suggestions; others will undoubtedly have different opinions about comma placement.  But I do note that it was a church group, rather than a family.  Killed were the pastor&#8217;s wife, and five children.  Two of the children were related, but none were related to the pastor&#8217;s wife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: igorbrejc.net &#187; Fresh Catch For March 23rd</title>
		<link>http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/the-1940s-happened-in-greyscale/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[igorbrejc.net &#187; Fresh Catch For March 23rd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The 1940s Happened in Greyscale &#171; Cartastrophe [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The 1940s Happened in Greyscale &laquo; Cartastrophe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bricknell</title>
		<link>http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/the-1940s-happened-in-greyscale/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Bricknell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If anyone would like to view or download a higher resolution please visit this link. 

https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0B7a0RMbQbQ7RYzc4ZmFiM2EtMzM5Yy00NWVjLTg2MzYtMGU2N2FkZmUwNjAw&amp;hl=en

Thanks

Michael]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone would like to view or download a higher resolution please visit this link. </p>
<p><a href="https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0B7a0RMbQbQ7RYzc4ZmFiM2EtMzM5Yy00NWVjLTg2MzYtMGU2N2FkZmUwNjAw&#038;hl=en" rel="nofollow">https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0B7a0RMbQbQ7RYzc4ZmFiM2EtMzM5Yy00NWVjLTg2MzYtMGU2N2FkZmUwNjAw&#038;hl=en</a></p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Medeiros</title>
		<link>http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/the-1940s-happened-in-greyscale/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Medeiros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oooo, how did I miss this? Fantastic example of a publication quality map of real (GISable) data. Looks like something you&#039;d see in a 1940&#039;s news reel. I agree with Daniel 100%, the use of almost all grey tones and a few elements in (commie alarmist) red is what makes the map work. This is what I would call a “teaching map”, it has a lot in terms of appropriate use of cartographic design while respecting the data.

My only critiques are fairly minor:
1)	State and province lines could be thinned down or screened back a little. They are the same density as the continental lines and some of the type. Pulling them back would help move the nation boundaries up a level in the visual hierarchy.
2)	Projections are inconsistently applied between the main map frames. Not sure if this a bad thing, but I noticed it right away.
3)	The shadow on the large red arrow bottom frame does not seem to match the smaller arrow shadows above.
4)	Aisa is too dark. It creates a kind of island effect where the ocean near the western pacific begins to look like land. Maybe a lighter shade would better.
5)	It might have been cool to see the large “launched” arrow drawn across the entire pacific, generalizing the route of most of the balloons. Although I see how that would ignore the many odd strikes away from the core US/Canada zone.

Cool map, any chance we could get a link to the full version of this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooo, how did I miss this? Fantastic example of a publication quality map of real (GISable) data. Looks like something you&#8217;d see in a 1940&#8242;s news reel. I agree with Daniel 100%, the use of almost all grey tones and a few elements in (commie alarmist) red is what makes the map work. This is what I would call a “teaching map”, it has a lot in terms of appropriate use of cartographic design while respecting the data.</p>
<p>My only critiques are fairly minor:<br />
1)	State and province lines could be thinned down or screened back a little. They are the same density as the continental lines and some of the type. Pulling them back would help move the nation boundaries up a level in the visual hierarchy.<br />
2)	Projections are inconsistently applied between the main map frames. Not sure if this a bad thing, but I noticed it right away.<br />
3)	The shadow on the large red arrow bottom frame does not seem to match the smaller arrow shadows above.<br />
4)	Aisa is too dark. It creates a kind of island effect where the ocean near the western pacific begins to look like land. Maybe a lighter shade would better.<br />
5)	It might have been cool to see the large “launched” arrow drawn across the entire pacific, generalizing the route of most of the balloons. Although I see how that would ignore the many odd strikes away from the core US/Canada zone.</p>
<p>Cool map, any chance we could get a link to the full version of this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Brauen</title>
		<link>http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/the-1940s-happened-in-greyscale/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Brauen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really like this map.  As you say, the muted colours work really well.

If I were to suggest a change in the design, it would be to try to avoid the use of the Mercator projection for the wind speed map and the way that is used to set up the graph below it.  In the current design, the regular spacing of the meridians on the projection are carried down into the graph showing the distribution of the balloon landing sites classified according to latitude of the landing site, as a proxy for distance.  The double duty of the graph to show what I believe is an average travel rate of the balloons and indicating how long the balloons would be expected to take to cover the distances reinforces the use of latitude as a proxy for distance travelled.

But then why not use a distance preserving projection for this map?  The launch sites seem to be reasonably close, given the overall scale of the map, so an azimuthal equidistant projection centred on the launch sites would allow a map user to read off the real distances travelled and you could redesign your graph to reclassify according to the real distance.

Thanks to Michael for sharing the map and Daniel for creating this blog!

Glenn]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like this map.  As you say, the muted colours work really well.</p>
<p>If I were to suggest a change in the design, it would be to try to avoid the use of the Mercator projection for the wind speed map and the way that is used to set up the graph below it.  In the current design, the regular spacing of the meridians on the projection are carried down into the graph showing the distribution of the balloon landing sites classified according to latitude of the landing site, as a proxy for distance.  The double duty of the graph to show what I believe is an average travel rate of the balloons and indicating how long the balloons would be expected to take to cover the distances reinforces the use of latitude as a proxy for distance travelled.</p>
<p>But then why not use a distance preserving projection for this map?  The launch sites seem to be reasonably close, given the overall scale of the map, so an azimuthal equidistant projection centred on the launch sites would allow a map user to read off the real distances travelled and you could redesign your graph to reclassify according to the real distance.</p>
<p>Thanks to Michael for sharing the map and Daniel for creating this blog!</p>
<p>Glenn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Woodruff</title>
		<link>http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/the-1940s-happened-in-greyscale/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Woodruff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartastrophe.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even after staring for a while in an attempt to find something wrong and offer constructive (no, douchey) criticism, all I really want to do is echo how damn nice this map is. I nod in agreement with everything in this post.

But I did manage to think of two things. First, the wind speed isolines don&#039;t entirely do it for me. Better would be the prevailing wind directions (if available), leaving us to rely on the graph at the bottom for an idea of speed. My brain really wants to fill in the unknowable details of the exact paths that the balloons took, which the wind speeds don&#039;t really allow for without direction (even though we can of course see where the balloons ended up).

Second, the sequential dot colors suggest quantity or some other numeric value more than they do dates. But I don&#039;t have a good suggestion for something better!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even after staring for a while in an attempt to find something wrong and offer constructive (no, douchey) criticism, all I really want to do is echo how damn nice this map is. I nod in agreement with everything in this post.</p>
<p>But I did manage to think of two things. First, the wind speed isolines don&#8217;t entirely do it for me. Better would be the prevailing wind directions (if available), leaving us to rely on the graph at the bottom for an idea of speed. My brain really wants to fill in the unknowable details of the exact paths that the balloons took, which the wind speeds don&#8217;t really allow for without direction (even though we can of course see where the balloons ended up).</p>
<p>Second, the sequential dot colors suggest quantity or some other numeric value more than they do dates. But I don&#8217;t have a good suggestion for something better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
